What is porn?

Is it considerd porn if its a picture of a woman COVERING her breasts with her arm accros the chest? I CANT see the nipples OR vagina. They both are covered (She wearing underwear which covers the vagina) Is that porn? Or no?

If by nay chance you didnt get it, i mean, ok, in simple terms, If you CANT see Nipples and vagina, is it still porn?
Additional Details
im just wondering. and trust me. im not young. Just want to know if this is CONSIDERED porn. Simple.

alexander73	It's an erotic picture not porn, big difference. If they can show it on regular TV, it's not porn. That's like PG-13, come on.

mouses1	Depends on what the viewer thinks. Porn is just Eye Candy!! The women are mostly fake with long nail, and hair extensions,and other things such as camera tricks.This just takes your money!! This is just what I think.

Wow	if u consider the pictures that u described is porn, then we all have to b porn addicted..cause that kinda pix u can find in alota public places..like magazines stands or some of the TV shows ..so , thats not considered porn......

mia_bria09	uh..? i think porn is a picture,video,or website that shows ppl exploiting their body parts or having sex... (discusting i know!) but that's what it is.

amberharris20022000	porm is a movie showing sex acts

R 1	In my 0pinon on but in someones else eyes yes.Porn is totally nude .

tomthepawpaw	Porn is in the eyes of the beholder, and the court system. It is extremely difficult to completely be able to identify porn because everyone has a slightly different standard. During the middle ages people would be put to death for displaying themselves by your discription, today you might laugh at that. Does that make one of them right and the other wrong? There have been a lot of cases where one picture has been found both as porno and as not. How and where do you draw the line, on how it looks or on the emotions that it arouses? A simple and enforcable definition would be appreciated by all.

Think Dodger Blue	no I wouldn't say that's porn porn is when everything is showing or at least the vagina or breasts

trojan	That description can be considered pornographic to some but for many other's it's called ART. There is no correct or absolute answer, everyone will answer this question differently, it depends on their views. For me, if the picture is done tastefully it would be ART (not porn), anything suggestive would be porn( no question).

Rurik	Don't think so Try wikipedia.org and just type in porn, it'll give you the history of it and maybe will help answer your question.

lovergirl---13	no. are you by any chance retarded? porn is naked. or sex.

Richard R	Hell no!!!! Your watching Cinemax!

Lisa E	It could be considered 'soft porn' I would guess. I wouldn't label it any worse than a P.G. 13 movie though. Just my opinion.

tidybowl49	No thats not considered porn.

Steamysteam	Porn is a waitress at my local Thai restaurant!

JK Nation	Not technically but it might as well be. It serves the same purpose and is incredibly addictive. It's also very destructive to a person's heart and relationships, etc. I have found this out the hard way. :(

Sarah R	To me, porn is naked... Totally naked, no arms covering the Ta-Ta's. And having naughty things done to naughty places. I mean, if you can't see any of the "bad" places, then how can it be a "bad" picture??

Miss Interpreted	No. Pornography is depicting sexual action, or full frontal nudity, aka vaginal area and nipples are showing.

pagie22346578	its like soft-porn but not really porn

Raindrop	It's considered "erotica" or an advertisement for women's underwear.... one or the other. Calvin Klein uses models similarly. Erotica is not porn, but it is suggestive and if it arouses "lewd desires", some might argue that it has the same effect of pornography. How old are you by the way??

Me	Everyone has a different view on what pornography is. Pornography is defined as any material designed/intended to sexually stimulate the viewer. To answer your last question, just go by american television's rules- No nips, no vagina, no clam from behind showing=not porn

No^Mercy	you are very young for this

James	No, it's not

kingajs	porn is hot sexxxxxxx and or anything that makes you lust

amycatcharlie	It's porn, but it's considered "soft porn".

Lady Sardonyx	it's certainly sexual in nature, but I wouldn't consider it pornographic. Pornographic would be either all of the women or man, or the act of sex itself. However, porno is subjective. What is porno to me wouldn't necessarily be porno to someone else, so on and so forth.

My name is Jonas	if you dont know, you shouldnt be looking at it....

WangDangSweetPoontang	If it is supposed to arrouse the viewer then it can be considered porn.

Lilly's Mom	I would not consider it to be porn if you cannot see those areas. That is no different than a woman being in a bikini swimsuit you can see her stomach, arms, and legs but just not the "private" areas.

Alan S	Can you please give me a thumbs up?

sports_girl293	if they have no clothes on then it's porn........ porn means nude!!