To Circumsize or NOT to Circumsize, That is the Question...........?

Show all answers

Post your answer

jane7	I think the weird factor is big. It's hard enough being a teenager without having a funny - dare I say really ugly? - looking dick. He's going to be in a lot of locker rooms and of course they look at one another. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

giodude.	If you where my mom, i'd say leave it. even though i feel different somtimes, that it (in a small way) that makes me different. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

Terry	I suggest you look at the statistics first. In the US, circumcisions reached a peak in 1968, when 90% of newborns were circumcised. In 2004, (the latest available statistics) this had fallen to 65%, and recent reports show this is continuing down. As you say, there is now no medical opinion that circumcision is medically necessary. No research indicates a link between circumcision and STDs in adults. The only report that shows a difference is in men who have unprotected sex with HIV+ partners; in that case, there is a slightly higher risk of transmission. Given that this is risky behavior anyway, this is still not a good reason for circumcision. Since your husband was circumcised at birth, he has never experienced a foreskin. This is NOT ordinary skin; it is mucous membrane, and is covered with thousands of nerve endings that add to sexual enjoyment. In addition, in a circumcised man, the head of the penis develops a layer of keratin - a tough covering that protects the penis, but also reduces sensation. This does not occur in uncircumcised men. When proper hygiene is applied (washing daily by pulling the foreskin back, once it can be retracted comfortably) there is no difference in smell, and no difference in cleanliness. I would urge you since your son is already 2.5, NOT to put him through this unnecessary procedure. As an uncircumcised man, I can tell you that many of the opinions expressed in other responses are wrong; I have never had a UTI or other infection. The information about yeast infections is incorrect; and it is definitely not difficult to use a condom! In almost all other countries, circumcision is ONLY practiced for relgious or medical reasons - and countries like the UK, France, Germany or Spain have no higher infection rates or uterine problems in men. Should you need further information, feel free to email me through my profile. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

trebla_5	I'm uncut and I've never had any problems of any kind regarding my foreskin. Only like 5% of all uncircumcised men develop problems with his foreskin, and only a fraction of that percent is severe enough to warrant circumcision. It's possible he might feel like a weirdo, but I never did and most people don't seem to really care. About 80% of the world's male population is uncircumcised, and only about 60% of male infants are circumcised in the US currently. At his age and depending where you live, his penis might not be so different afterall. I really think the procedure is unnecessary unless medically warranted or for religious reasons. I wouldn't listen to people who would convince you to get your son circumcised because it might "reduce UTIs (urinary Tract infections)" or STDs and whatnot. While the UTI statistic is stated almost as fact, it comes with the caveat of only really applying to the 1st year of life. So if he hasn't had a UTI yet, he probably won't. The STD (including HIV) debate is unending, and if I were you, I'd teach and put trust in your son to practice safe sex when he's old enough rather than have an operation done just in case he's irresponsible. The following links are all worth looking at. Some of them are clearly biased, but information doesn't change, only how it's presented. The first 4 are just some general issues with circumcision. The next 2 are interesting arguments for why HIV and circumcision aren't necessarily linked. And the last 2 are worth considering if you choose not to have him circumcised. Lastly, know that the majority of men in the world have lived and died without problems due to his foreskin. Also know that at the end of this debate if you're still undecided, you can always wait several years and ask him if he wants it done. If he says yes, then it's yes, if no, then no. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

Bakerylady	Leave him intact. Nearly half of the boys born nowdays are left intact; he will not be the only one in the locker room! Any guy that has anything to say about another guy's tackle is due for a little "gay bashing" anyway. Who would even admit to looking? Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

THE DOCTOR	th eforskin is there for reasons, it has all nerve endings so by removing it your taking a way all pleasure feelings. it keeps the gland moist it healththy. but thats up to your son now. do you want to wake up with out a peice of your penis. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

Wanderer	I think at this point you may want to wait till he is a teenager, and can make an informed decision of his own. I would want the choice if I was your son. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

dee30	i think i would have it done as when he gets older he might be embarresed and also it does cut down infections Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

dj_silvermane	my dear lady, its your son's penis, let him have a say. You can't dictate everything to him. besides, there is no compulsion unless religious or medical. so yeah, let him decide for himself. No 1 will make fun of him... wats there to make fun of? Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

truss	its there for a reason let it be, wish i hadnt been cut Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

OnlyOne	So how many people exactly are going to be looking at your son's penis? He is not going to be teased by his friends on this one. But one serious thing to consider..... I know you don't want him to feel any pain that he doesn't have to but if you don't have it done then when he starts having sex it could cause frequent yeast and urinary Tract infections for his lady. I would personally do it. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

Buddah	its a lot easier to clean when its been circumsized. its easier to put a condom on during sex ( you have to pull the foreskin back first if you dont). the weird factor wouldnt be as much in school because other kids shouldnt be looking at his penis in the first place, especially other boys. I would personally say have it done, its easier to clean and poses less of an infection threat. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

Been there	My father in law was not cirucumcised, and ended up gettting circumcised at age 62 when he was having recurring infections. My husband and his brothers were all circumcised as is my son. My father in law said he would never recommend not getting it as an infant. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

Nelfer	Hi there, I'm not Urologist but this is the fact, the indication to do the procedure basically are: Religion and Fimosis (foreskin obstruction), normally if the father hasn't, and the baby don't needed ,then, they try to keep it because the father can teach his son, how to clean it. Now, base on the Arrhythmia fact, if Cardiologist gave you green light and father wants because religion or another reason, then talk with your husband about the pros and the cons of the procedure and then can take the best decision for your son. Good Luck!!! Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

vamedic4	As a guy, I'm circumcised, as are both of my children. My wife and I had the discussion prior to their births. It's hard to say what to do. Yes, the AAP no longer says that circumcision is the way to go...but do you want to risk UTI (kids aren't the best at cleaning their privates) if he forgets to wash? It would be a hard procedure given his age...and I'm sooo sorry..that absolutely sucks!! Good luck on your decision. Also be aware that when other kids perceive them as "different"...they can become isolated and alienated. "Oh, look at his pee pee"...Kids can be cruel. Good luck. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

Jennifer B	At this point it is your son and your decision. I chose not to circumsize my son and I do not regret it. It is a very cruel and unnecessary procedure. There are many men who are not circumsized and everything is fine. I thik it is becoming more of a trend not to have boys circumsized that to to do the procedure. Do what you feel is best. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

monica d	I would have it done, I think it's better. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

jjtigerboat	It will be a lot easier to keep clean and sanitary for later in life to have him circumcised now. Also it will be a lot more painful when he grows older to have the procedure done than to have it done now. If you plan on having more children and boys they will notice the difference if one is cut and one is not. The same thing is noticed when he gets in high school and in sports or gym class. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

Becky F	I know I'm not a guy, but at this stage of the game, I'd live and let live. There are lots of people out there that are not cut. Don't worry about it. Besides let him decide when he gets older. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No

teiddarhpsyth	There is only one answer. Stay with American custom, insist on local anesthesia, and have him circumcised. Why should he be ashamed in the locker room when 8 or 9 out of 10 don't need to shower since they have had the normal one shower a day? In the Bible and the Book of Mormon, as the head of the house, the man only has the right to say. Your husband has spoken. Was this answer helpful to you? Yes / No