
Star dust
 |
good idea, but may just backfire, as then they would just sit at home all day eating the burgers and cakes and so they won't even get the litle exercise of walking to public places to eat the burgers.x
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

stand@btinternet.com
|
YES! I should!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

lateralus28117
|
Yes, because all we need are more fascist laws like the smoking ones we have now...
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

§eeker
 |
i think "skinnies" should be banned from being in public places at all, due to the effect they have on our younger generations. ie eating disorders? Would you feel better if those "fatties" gorged themselves then vomitted?
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

lollipops_mum
 |
If everyone with unhealthy bad habits is banned from doing it in public there would be no-one on the streets.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

phillip b
 |
quite right it is easy to attack smokers and try and stop them enjoying their habbit everywhere. maybe fat ppl should be banned from fast food shops and cake shops and resturants as they put me off my food
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

sean_richins
|
Thats great dude!!! Is that all u think about?!?!?!?!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

stephen b
|
No fatties should just be banned from public
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

ginga
 |
yes I think that they should be stopped - and as for them not causing any damage to any one else - well just take a second and think - what if they sat on you - that would be well damaging
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Liddy is Lost
|
Well, it's not quite the same thing. Smoking in public places is a burden on other people's health, eating a cheese burger isn't. Also you would have to just ban everyone from eathing cakes/burgers, because anyone can have health problems from a poor diet, regardless of their weight/size. For example, diabetes or high blood pressure. HTH : )
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

ljb
 |
No.
First of all, banning them from eating those things in public would do absolutely nothing to address the justification you offer for introducing the ban. It would have no bearing on their health or on the costs. If you can't eat cake in public and you want cake, you'll eat cake in private.
Second of all, and I do so hate to break it to the many people who don't seem to realize this, but not all weight problems are a result of overeating. Are many of them? Sure. But to say weight problems -- and obesity in particular -- is caused by eating too much is an oversimplification. Even if we were to conclude that the vast majority -- say, 90 percent -- of obese persons were obese solely because of overeating, and not due to other factors....a ban on eating cake, etc. in public would be too broad a "solution" for the problem you're trying to combat, ensnaring in its net many people who wouldn't belong there. And while 10 percent might not seem like much, with 2/3 of the entire US population now "overweight," that is a LOT of people.
Smoking bans took off because of the effects of second hand smoke, not because we care about smokers' health, and not because we think the bans will save money (although, if they do, no one would argue that it's not a nice consequence). If you're at a restaurant and someone at the next table is eating cake, it has no effect on your health whatsoever -- regardless of whether that person weighs 90 pounds soaking wet or has to special order her clothes because no store carries a size large enough. Maybe you'll see her eating cake and think "Mmmm. Cake. Maybe I'll have a slice." Or maybe you'll see her eating cake and think "Fat slob. She should be at Golds Gym, not a restaurant! Ugh!" Or maybe you'll think something entirely different. But whatever you think, her eating that cake has nothing to do with you.
People don't really want to impose bans or other restrictions to address other people's health problems and the consequences those problems have on health care or public costs. If they did, we wouldn't be talking just about behavior that we think is "disgusting" or "unattractive." I don't hear a lot of talk about banning cardiac patients from eating certain foods (cardiac disease is the leading cause of death in the US, and you can bet we're all "paying" for it), or banning alcohol consumption (to cut down on accidents -- forget death, do you know how many people each year are disabled as a result?) Etc.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

DNA
 |
of course not! Some of these overweight people are that way because of medical conditions or as a side effect of medications. Ever see kids who need a kidney transplant? They are often overweight because they are filled up with fluid because of a side effect of their medication. You or anyone else for that matter has no right to judge others, especially when you have no idea why that person is overweight in the first place.
If an overweight person is eating in a restaurant, how's that harming you? If a smoker is smoking in a restaurant, that does harm others. Smoking and eating are two entirely different things.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

dark dude
 |
NOPE THATS JUST STUPID! THEY PAY LOTS OF TAX AND KEEP THE ECONOMY GOING. THEY SHOULD ON THE OTHER HAND, BE REFUSED ANY SORT OF TREATMENT UNTILL THEY ARE BELOW A CERTAIN WEIGHT LIMIT :D FAT B*******S.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

~Les~
 |
That is cruel. The "fatties" don't harm you. And eating in public has no relation to smoking as far as laws stand. Try to be nice to other people at out there, fat, skinny, black, white. We are all people with feelings and lives. Be considerate.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

ThisRichPerfectGrl
 |
That's mean! Sure they might need to go on a diet, but isn't that mean? I mean they can't help it if they have to eat. Some people calm down by eating, others smoking :-( and some others, drawing ect. Maybe they should just make smaller burgers or something
Seriously give them a break. Im sure glad i am not fat, being bullied by you people.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Just Me
|
Smoking in public is a problem because other people are breathing in the smoke. When you are gorging out on burgers and cakes it is not being ingested by anyone but you. In my opinion if you choose to do that then that is your deal. But later on don't try to slap a lawsuit on some fast food joint for your own lack of self control.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

El Santo Gordo
 |
Like smokers, there will always be somewhere that we can eat; after all, unless the cow goes extinct, as with tobacco, we're gonna eat. At 6'2" I don't look particularly fat, but I shan't be remoresful in my delight of a burger bigger than a steering wheel... and like the smoking I once did, if I care to do it, I'll just be polite about it.
I will say this though: if you come wagging your finger at me, don't expect me NOT to lace it with ketchup and try biting you.
Much Love,
Jaime
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Vesna G
|
Hm ... maybe even better banning stupid people from talking in public ... or forcing ugly faces to stay at home ... ha ...
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

mac
 |
Right after you are banned from breathing the same air as human beings because you definitely are from another species unknown to man and definitely not loved by woman.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Tish
|
Can we ban the idiots (like you) from speaking in public too??
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

ame2607
|
u ****
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Svea
 |
how can you live with yourself? If they want to eat burgers and junk food all day, that's their business, not yours.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

missree
|
mmm that's an interesting concept however, smokers risk the lives of non-smokers too and therefore have more of an impact/burden upon the NHS whereas with obesity only that one person will ultimately be needing treatment and with the smokers them and the passive smokers will need treatment.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Really peeved
 |
at first i thought about whether to report u
for insulting other participants.
then i thought discretion might be the better part on that one.
i am a thinny
what u gonna do
put me in stocks and force feed me in public?????
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Nelly
 |
o ur mean pal....real nice...............
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Bethany
|
no.. smoking creates secondhand smoke and harms other people. eating cakes and burgers only harms themselves.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Miss Crickett
 |
If someone chooses to eat themselves into a blimp then that it only putting themselves at risk. Their action does not have any adverse affect on your health. Unlike smoking cigarettes, which 2nd hand smoke is putting others health at risk. If your choices only affect you, then no one should care. It is when your choices also affect someone else that others should be concerned.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

star_gazer
 |
BRYAN you need to focus on your self. SEEMS as tho your issues are greater.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

didymos
|
as long as drinkers and drugheads receive equal treatment. the in fairness obese people only harm themselves unlike bloody smokers and druggies
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Chanteuse_ar
 |
No, they just need to ban morons from Yahoo Answers.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

francis p
 |
ignore all these lot i totally agree with you!!!!!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|