
Jack D
 |
No. Eat now. Everything in the house. I hope this is a joke.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

sweetandtenderhooligan138
|
someone is obviously bored and needs attention.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

paulie
|
your crazy.....not fat
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Ashley A
|
No, just right. Nomarl weight for your height is between 135 & 176.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

CH CH CH-Yeah!
 |
You are a liar...that's what your are.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

madelyn
|
um do u mean 163!! and no u r talll so u shouldnt be as long as uv got some muscle to ya
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Amanda♥♥
 |
ur such a liar there is no possible way that you are 63lbs!!!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Mrs. Chill
 |
Your kidding, right?
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

dj_extreme32
 |
Why do some people ask such ignorant questions. You sound like a bean pole to me. You could be 5' even and still not be fat.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Sam B
 |
im 5'7" and im 175 lbs. but im not fat im muscular so it depends what your body type is. plus 163 isnt that heavy either way.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Chika the "Rudeness"
 |
You're very far from it.
63 pounds is the weight of the adverage 7-9 year old.
Sorry to say but I think you have an eating disorder, go to the doctor or you will die from it.
EDIT: Sorry, I posted before I read that you messed up the weight.
163 pounds still is not fat. Even if people say you look chunky or the media is making you feel huge, or whatever it is that's telling you you're too big is wrong. As long as you look and feel healthy, you're a perfect size!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

onilink23
 |
You ARE kidding, correct?
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Marvelous
 |
You must have left something out. I'm 5'10 and only 132 lbs...and pretty skinny. I don't know how you could possible be only 63 lbs.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

GONZAR
 |
Yes, you're a blimp. You must have to pay for 2 seats on airlines.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

phloyd87
|
hehehehahahahahAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA haha, oh uh-hahaha hee he, hehe, heheehe ha! ha!
yes.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

thedonutkid
|
troll
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

AlliTheCat
|
at 5'11 your bones would weigh about 20 pounds in your body right now, your organs might weigh another 15 and what little muscle tissue you had on your body would probably not be able to lift your skeleton if you tried to get out of bed in the morning, your brain would have shrunk by a lot if you had starved yourself to this point. You probably don't weight 63 pounds. If you're telling people that, they're going to think there's something wrong with you mentally. I knew an extremely thin 70 pound girl who was 4'11 but she was hospitalized before summer camp ended. She was also so depressed she was slicing her arms open every night.
If you mean 163, then no, you're not fat for your height but you might want to check your BMI to see how much of your body is fat and how much is muscle. An indication that you might want want to worry is if you carry most of the weight on your torso or have an "apple" shape. This can be a potential sign of inherited health conditions like heart problems or diabetes. But I said POTENTIAL sign. It's not a guarantee. Likewise, if you're so underweight that your health should be considered at risk, your heart would be the most in danger. Anorexics die of heart attacks all the time.
Be careful. Being thin isn't as important as being happy and being alive is easier to work with than being dead. Try to stay above ground, dear. I guarantee that when you're 25, you're going to look back at pictures of your teen years and wonder what your problem was because you looked adorable!
The world doesn't need another Mary-Kate Olsen... She's going to look back at pictures of how she is now and probably cry because she wasted time looking so miserable.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Matt H
|
you are probaly anorexic
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Silly, boy! Tricks are 4 whores
|
FAT??? Are you high?? ...That's under weight stupid! Go talk with your doctor, of how to gain that weight up. You can get very sick or even die that way.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

*Banana Burst*
|
If your only 63 pounds then you should be sick..thats not normal.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

**Princess Nash**
 |
u can't be 63 pounds..i think you mean kilos..if ur 63 pounds then i'm answering a dead person now..
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

azkul86
|
he could mean 63 stone
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

themadprofessor
|
Hard to say - a lot would depend on your frame and how the weight's distributed. For a basketball player's body, might be a tad overweight; for a footballer/wrestler, probably not; for a non-atheletic type, quite possibly.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Chris B
|
No, by those dimensions you are 'ribbed for her pleasure'.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Buff B
 |
no heck no. 63 pounds!! you are as light as a feather!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Angie
 |
you're not fat, just crazy.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

QT Pie
|
sickly thin
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

JM
|
please tell me you mean 163, if you were that tall and 63 pounds you would be dead because that's too skinny!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

expensive soul
 |
you are wayyyyyyy too underweight.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

...Melissa...
|
Are you sure you don't mean 163?
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Imaka
 |
No, you are not fat. You are fine.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|